File Name: | boeing 767 operators manual.pdf |
Size: | 3448 KB |
Type: | PDF, ePub, eBook, fb2, mobi, txt, doc, rtf, djvu |
Category: | Book |
Uploaded | 29 May 2019, 12:10 PM |
Interface | English |
Rating | 4.6/5 from 807 votes |
Status | AVAILABLE |
Last checked | 16 Minutes ago! |
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. ( November 2015 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message ) Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. ( November 2015 ) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message ) Flight International. Flightglobal (published 9 August 2018). (subscription required) By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The Boeing 767 is a mid-size, wide-body twinjet airliner produced by Boeing Commercial Airplanes.The 767 has a fuselage width of 15 ft 6 in (472.44 cm) that is midway between the two other aircraft.The wings were larger and provided longer range than the initial customers wanted. However, the larger wings only increased fuel usage slightly and provided better takeoff and landing performance.The 767 was approved for U.S. CAT IIIb operation in March 1984. This revision permitted operations with minimums as low as RVR 300 (Runway Visual Range 300 feet).After strong sales in 1997, sales have declined significantly, due to the economic recession of the early 2000s, increased competition from Airbus, and the recent emergence of a direct replacement program, the Boeing 787. Boeing has also kept the line open in hopes of winning the US Air Force's competition for a tanker (the KC-767 tanker program, which uses the 767 airframe).It has a retractable tricycle landing gear and is powered by two wing mounted turbofan engines. The 767 has a seat-to-aisle ratio in economy class of an efficient 3.5 seats per aisle, allowing for quicker food service and quicker exit of the airplane than many other jetliners, which typically have four to six seats per aisle in economy class. Its fuselage width does not allow larger ULDs such as LD6s, LD11s, and LD3s. The 767-400ER also features larger windows exactly like those found on the 777.http://www.oliviars.it/img/img_text/3c17204-manual.xml
All new 767s built feature the Signature Interior, and it is also available as a retrofit for older 767s. This retrofit borrows styling elements from the Boeing Signature Interior; however, the outer section overhead bins are traditional-style shelf bins rather than the 777-style pivot bins.Although there are a total of three variants, several versions have been produced.The 767-200 typically is outfitted with 181 seats in a 3-class layout or 224 in a 2-class layout. All -200 models have a capacity limit of 255 due to exit-door limitations.It became the first 767 to complete a nonstop transatlantic journey, and broke the flying distance record for twinjet airliners several times.It first flew on January 14, 1986, and was delivered to JAL on September 25. It first flew in 1986 and received its first commercial orders when American Airlines purchased several in 1987. The aircraft entered service with AA in 1988. In 1995, EVA Air used a 767-300ER to inaugurate the first transpacific 767 service. The -300ER has a minimum takeoff run of around 6,000 ft (1,825 m), and a maximum of 7,900 ft (2,400 m).Due to its unique fuselage width of 15 ft 6 in, it is unable to carry ordinary Unit Load Devices, and instead has to use specially designed air freight containers and pallets. This model has three doors on the main deck plus two on the lower deck. Of the three doors on top, two are at the front, and one is at the rear right side. The two lower doors comprise of one at the right front and one at the rear left.The 767-300 is expected to be replaced by the 787-8 in Boeing's lineup.Orders were also placed by others including Kenya Airways and ILFC but these were eventually canceled. Kenya Airways and ILFC converted their orders to the Boeing 777. This variant is only available as the 767-400ER, as there was no 767-400 variant. However it has less range than the other two ER variants.http://industrialemirsa.com/userfiles/3c905cx-manual.xml
It was introduced along with the Boeing 747X and was to be powered by 747X engines ( Engine Alliance GP7172 and Rolls Royce plc Trent 600). However, in 2001 Boeing canceled -400ERX development.The 767-400ER is expected to be replaced by the 787-9 in Boeing's lineup.Most military 767s are derived from the 767-200ER.The aircraft was later renamed the Airborne Surveillance Testbed (AST).Japan operates four E-767s.This is an all-new system, with a powerful Active Electronically Scanned Array and not based upon the Japanese AWACS aircraft. One 767-400ER aircraft has been produced as a testbed for systems integration and is in storage pending a decision on its final disposition since the E-10 program has been terminated.The pilots used the aircraft's ram air turbine to power the aircraft's hydraulic systems for control. There were no fatalities.None of the 223 aboard survived.The pilots used the aircraft's ram air turbine as an emergency power source. Of the 175 aboard, 123 died. Still, the incident is one of the few instances of a plane landing on water with survivors.In addition to those on board the planes, 2602 people perished on the ground, mostly in the two towers.Passengers and crew prevented him from bombing the aircraft and he was arrested, convicted, and imprisoned.Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2006, ISBN 0-06-088241-9. If you continue using our website, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. The aircraft is the most widely used aircraft on cross-Atlantic routes. The 767 first entered service in 1982 with United Air Lines. Boeing has delivered more than 1,000 767s that are flown by more than 80 operators around the world. The 767 has accumulated more than nine million flights. More than 26 airlines operate both 757 and 767 aircraft allowing the airlines flexibility in flight crew assignment and in reduced operating logistics requirements such as reduced spares inventories.
The aircraft have the same flight crew operating instructions, similar maintenance schedules, manuals and inspection routines. The range is up to 12,325km. The aircraft first flew in 1984 with first delivery in 1984 to El Al airlines. 121 767-200ER aircraft have been ordered and delivered. First flight was in 1986 with first delivery in 1988 to American Airlines. 540 767-300ER aircraft have been ordered and 528 delivered. First delivery was in 1995 to United Parcel Service. 82 767-300F aircraft have been ordered and 49 delivered. The stretched aircraft provides seating for 304 passengers in two-class cabin layout and 245 seats for passengers in a three-class layout. The 767-400ER entered service with Continental Airlines (total order 16) in September 2000 and with Delta Airlines (total order 21) in October 2000. The new, highly backswept (raked) wing-tip extensions increase the 767’s 156ft wingspan to 170ft 4in (52m). The 7ft 8in (2.4m) wing extensions are designed to increase the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing and thus improve the range. 38 767-400ER aircraft have been ordered and 37 delivered. The aircraft’s flight instrument system is the Honeywell EFIS-700.The navigation suite includes Honeywell VHF omnidirectional radio, an integrated instrument landing system, and a marker beacon receiver, an automatic direction finder, distance measuring system and a radio magnetic indicator RMI-743. There are dual digital flight management systems and triple redundant flight control computers. The aircraft carries CAT IIIb landing certification. The system incorporates six 203mm x 203 mm (8in x 8in) liquid crystal displays. The available engines are General Electric CF6-80 engines rated at 225kN to 276kN, Pratt and Whitney PW 4052, 4056, 4060 and 4062 rated at 233 to 282kN and the Rolls Royce RB211 rated at 251kN and 265kN. The forward retracting nose unit supplied by Menasco has twin wheels.
The inward retracting main landing gear supplied by Cleveland Pneumatic is fitted with two four wheeled bogies. The wheels are supplied by Honeywell. The main landing gear has steel disc brakes and a hydraulically actuated tail skid. We recommend you upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or switch to a browser like Firefox or Chrome. In service since 1986 (ER since 1989). Stretched version of B767-200. Exists in an ER (extended range) version for Extended Range Twin Engine Operation. The B763 is member of the B767 family of aircraft.The Investigation noted the twice-daily runway configuration change made due to noise abatement reasons was imminent. At the same time, a Boeing 767-300 was stationary on taxiway Echo and waiting in line to depart from runway 16. The left wing tip of the Boeing 747 collided with the right horizontal stabiliser of the Boeing 767 as the first aircraft passed behind. Both aircraft were on scheduled passenger services from Melbourne to Sydney. The Investigation found that the A320 had been instructed to park on a stand that was supposed to be blocked, a procedural requirement if the adjacent stand is to be used by a wide body aircraft and although this error had been detected by the stand allocation system, the alert was not noticed, in part due to inappropriate configuration. It was found that the crossing clearance had been given by the same trainee controller who had then cleared the 767 for take off after assuming that the towing traffic had cleared based on an unverified assumption based upon incorrect information which had been received earlier from an Assistant Controller. Meanwhile, another Boeing 767-300, operated by Japan Airlines, had been given landing clearance and was on approach to the same runway. After an incorrect readback, the Air Canada B767 entered the runway to line up. There was no actual risk of collision.
Both aircraft were being operated in accordance with conflicting air traffic clearances issued by the same controller. None of the three controllers present in the TWR including the Supervisor noticed the error until alerted by the aircraft rejected take off call. ) B763, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2014 ( On 12 October 2014, a Boeing 767-300 commenced take-off at Addis Ababa in accordance with its clearance but rejected take-off at 135 knots when the crew saw an obstruction ahead in the centre of the runway and it stopped approximately 100 metres from a vehicle. The Investigation found that the GND controller had cleared the vehicle to enter the runway, the TWR controller had given take-off clearance without first checking that that the runway was clear. None of the 194 occupants were injured and there was no damage to the aircraft or conflict with other traffic or vehicles. The third rostered crew member had become incapacitated en route with the consequence that neither of the other pilots had been able to take any in flight rest. ) B763, Chicago O'Hare IL USA, 2016 ( On 28 October 2016, an American Airlines Boeing 767-300 made a high speed rejected takeoff after an uncontained right engine failure. A successful emergency evacuation of the 170 occupants was completed as a major fuel-fed fire destroyed the failed engine and substantially damaged the aircraft structure. The failure was attributed to an undetected sub-surface manufacturing defect which was considered to have escaped detection because of systemically inadequate materials inspection requirements rather than any failure to apply existing practices. Safety issues in relation to an evacuation initiated by cabin crew following a rejected takeoff and fire were also examined.
) B763, Copenhagen Denmark, 1999 ( On 24 August 1999, a Boeing 767-300 being operated by SAS on a scheduled passenger flight from Copenhagen to Tokyo was unable to get airborne from the take off roll on Runway 22R in normal daylight visibility and made a rejected take off from high speed. The aircraft was taxied clear of the runway and after a precautionary attendance of the RFFS because of overheated brakes, the passengers were disembarked and transported to the terminal. There was minor damage to the aircraft landing gear and rear fuselage. ) B763, Frankfurt Germany, 2007 ( On 20 August 2007, at Frankfurt, while a Boeing 767-300 was taxiing to its parking position, thick smoke developed in the passenger cabin. The Investigation found that the management of the runway safety risk by the airport authority had been systemically inadequate and that the communication of what was known by ATC about the runway surface condition had been incomplete. A number of subsequent corrective actions taken by the airport authority were noted. ) B763, Luton UK, 2005 ( On 16 February 2005, at Luton Airport, a Boeing B767-300 collided with the tug pulling it forward when the shear pin of the unserviceable tow bar being used to pull the aircraft broke. The aircraft ran onto the tug when the ground crew stopped the tug suddenly. As result of the collision with the tug the aircraft fuselage and landing gear was damaged. ) B763, Manchester UK, 1998 ( On 25th November 1998, baggage containers on a B767, moved in flight causing damage to a cabin floor beam and damage to the standby system power supply cable causing electrical arcing. The aircraft landed safely at Manchester, UK, and the damage was only discovered during unloading. ) B763, Manchester UK, 2008 ( On 13 December 2008, a Thomsonfly Boeing 767-300 departing from Manchester for Montego Bay Jamaica was considered to be accelerating at an abnormally slow rate during the take off roll on Runway 23L.
The aircraft commander, who was the pilot not flying, consequently delayed the V1 call by about 10 - 15 because he thought the aircraft might be heavier than had been calculated. During the rotation the TAILSKID message illuminated momentarily, indicating that the aircraft had suffered a tail strike during the takeoff. The commander applied full power and shortly afterwards the stick shaker activated briefly. The aircraft continued to climb away and accelerate before the flaps were retracted and the after-takeoff check list completed. The appropriate drills in the Quick Reference Handbook (QRH) were subsequently actioned, fuel was dumped and the aircraft returned to Manchester for an overweight landing without further incident. ) B763, Melbourne Australia, 2006 ( On 3 August 2006, a Qantas Boeing 767-300 encountered a large flock of birds during rotation and sustained multiple strikes on many parts of the aircraft. Left engine vibration immediately increased but as reducing thrust also reduced the vibration, it was decided following consultation with maintenance to continue to the planned destination, Sydney. ) B763, Montreal Quebec Canada, 2013 ( On 4 November 2013, smoke began to appear in the passenger cabin of a Boeing 767 which had just begun disembarking its 243 passengers via an airbridge after arriving at Montreal. The source was found to be a belt loader in position at the rear of the aircraft which had caught fire. Emergency evacuation using the airbridge only was ordered by the aircraft commander but cabin conditions led to other exits being used too. The fire was caused by a fuel leak and absence of an emergency stop button had prevented it being extinguished until the airport fire service arrived.
) B763, Singapore, 2015 ( On 12 July 2015, a Japanese-operated Boeing 767-300 deviated from its acknowledged clearance and lit-centreline taxi routing and began take-off from a parallel taxiway in good night visibility, crossing a lit red stop bar in the process. When ATC observed this, the aircraft was instructed to stop which was achieved without further event. A subsequent take-off was uneventful. The Investigation attributed inability to achieve successful gear extension using either alternate system or free fall to crew failure to notice that the Battery Busbar CB which controlled power to the uplock release mechanism was tripped. Gear extension using the normal system had been precluded in advance by a partial hydraulic system failure soon after takeoff from New York. ) B763, en-route North Bay Canada, 2009 ( On 19 June 2009 a Boeing 767-300 was level at FL330 in night IMC when the Captain’s altimeter and air speed indicator readings suddenly increased, the latter by 44 knots. The altimeter increase triggered an overspeed warning and the Captain reduced thrust and commenced a climb. The resultant stall warning was followed by a recovery. The Investigation found that a circuitry fault had caused erroneous indications on only the Captain’s instruments and that contrary to the applicable QRH procedure, no comparison with the First Officer’s or Standby instruments had been made. A related Operator FCOM error was also identified. ) B763, en-route, Atlantic Ocean, 2008 ( On 28 January 2008, the first officer on a B767, flying from Toronto to London, became incapacitated and the captain elected to divert to the nearest airport, Shannon, Ireland.
) B763, en-route, New York NY USA, 2000 ( On 30 March 2000, a Delta Airlines-operated Boeing 767-300 which was 15nm southeast of New York JFK after departure from there and was being flown visually at night by the First Officer with an 'international relief pilot' as extra crew on the flight deck, achieved 66 degrees of right bank before any of the the pilots noticed. A successful recovery was made with no consequences for the occupants and the aircraft then returned to JFK. ) B763, en-route, North West Thailand, 1991 ( On 26 May 1991, a Lauda Air Boeing 767-300 experienced an un-commanded deployment of a thrust reverser climbing out of Bangkok which quickly led to a terminal loss of control and subsequent ground impact which destroyed the aircraft. The cause of the PW4000 thrust reverser fault was not established but it was noted that certification requirements included the ability to continue flight under any possible thrust reverser position and that there had been no pilot training requirement for, or awareness of, the essential response which would have required full aileron and rudder corrective action within 4 to 6 seconds. ) B763, en-route, Northern France, 1998 ( On 9 January 1998, a Boeing 767-300 operated by United Airlines experienced an electrical systems malfunction subsequently attributed to arcing in a faulty electrical loom. The crew elected to divert to London Heathrow where emergency evacuation was carried out on a taxiway upon landing. ) B763, en-route, mid North Atlantic, 2011 ( On 14 January 2011 an Air Canada Boeing 767-300 was midway across the Atlantic Ocean eastbound at night when the First Officer, who had just woken from an exceptionally long period in-seat rest, suddenly but erroneously perceived a collision risk from oncoming traffic and without warning intervened to dive the aircraft before the Captain could stop him causing 16 occupant injuries.
It was concluded that many Air Canada pilots did not understand the reasoning behind these procedures. ) B763, en-route, near Ovalle Chile, 2005 ( On 2 January 2005, a Boeing 767-300 being operated by Air Canada on a scheduled passenger flight in day VMC from Toronto to Santiago, Chile was approximately 180 nm north of the intended destination and in the cruise at FL370 when it suffered a run down of the left engine which flight deck indications suggested was due to fuel starvation. A MAYDAY was declared to ATC and during the subsequent drift down descent, with the cross feed valve open, the failed engine was successfully restarted and the flight was completed with both engines operating without further incident. ) B763, vicinity Chicago IL USA, 2007 ( On March 15, 2007, at night, a Boeing 767-300, operated by United Airlines, experienced a bird strike after take-off from Chicago O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, Illinois. The airplane ecountered a flock of ducks about 800 feet above ground level (AGL) resulting in the complete failure of the left engine. ATC became aware that the 767 was catching up with the 737 but were aware that it was in visual contact and therefore took no action to ensure separation was maintained. Only a query from approaching aircraft which had been cleared to land prompted by hearing a take off clearance being given for the same runway alerted ATC to the simultaneous runway use clearances. The Investigation was unable to establish why the BN2 pilot failed to follow their conditional clearance but noted that the 'follow' clearance given onto final approach had not been accompanied by a sequence number, and when giving the aircraft type to be followed so that its sighting could be reported, the controller had not challenged the incomplete readback or repeated the aircraft type when subsequently issuing the clearance. ). Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Flight International. Flightglobal (published 9 August 2018). (subscription required) Some templates were removed (like “article needs expansion) or assigned (like “hatnotes”). CSS classes were either removed or harmonized. Wikipedia specific links which do not lead to an article or category (like “Redlinks”, “links to the edit page”, “links to portals”) were removed. Every external link has an additional FontAwesome-Icon. Beside some small changes of design, media-container, maps, navigation-boxes, spoken versions and Geo-microformats were removed. Information as of: 22.06.2020 09:46:16 CEST - Please note: Because the given content is automatically taken from Wikipedia at the given point of time, a manual verification was and is not possible. Therefore LinkFang.org does not guarantee the accuracy and actuality of the acquired content. If there is an Information which is wrong at the moment or has an inaccurate display please feel free to contact us: email. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.Read our policy. The carrier’s crew operating manual does not have specific procedures for inadvertent selection of a go-around switch. While the extent of such events is not clear, the request returned data on 11 incidents involving various aircraft types. Analysis Freighter conversions fall away sharply in 2019 2020-01-23T08:53:00Z Freighter conversions fell 33% in 2018, with declines in the widebody, narrowbody, and regional aircraft freighter segments. Cirium fleets data shows that 2019 saw 74 commercial aircraft converted to freighters, down from 110 in 2018. Source: Cirium fleets data Freighter conversions by year.
News Spectre of pitch-up illusion emerges in Atlas 767 crash probe 2019-12-20T09:47:00Z Investigators have alluded to the possibility that an Atlas Air Boeing 767-300 freighter pilot experienced somatogravic illusion before the aircraft entered a fatal dive on approach to Houston. The aircraft had been descending through cloud at 6,000ft when its go-around mode activated and its engine thrust increased, causing the. Civil aviation minister Hardeep Singh Puri says an inquiry has been ordered into the 7 August accident involving flight IX1344 from Dubai. At least 18 occupants of the Air India. Opinion Air India Express 737-800 breaks up in Kozhikode excursion 2020-08-07T20:25:00Z Both pilots of an Air India Express Boeing 737-800 are among 17 fatalities after the aircraft suffered a runway excursion and broke up after landing at Kozhikode. The airline has disclosed that 190 occupants, including six crew members, were on board the jet. Neither pilot survived the accident,. We provide news, data, analytics and advisory services to connect the aviation community globally and help organisations shape their business strategies, identify new opportunities and make better decisions faster. Please upload ASAP It's information is being incorporated into Advisory Circular (AC) 60-28, and has been incorporated into FSIMS Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 5. We recommend you upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or switch to a browser like Firefox or Chrome. When ATC observed this, the aircraft was instructed to stop which was achieved without further event. A subsequent take-off was uneventful.When ATC observed this, the controller instructed the aircraft to stop which was achieved without further event. After verifying with the flight crew that they could continue with the flight, it was re-cleared to taxi to the departure runway 20C via a new lit-centreline routing and the aircraft subsequently took off without further event.
By the time the Investigation began, CVR and FDR data had been overwritten but the QAR data retrieved by Japan Airlines was made available to the Investigation team.The Investigation did not note the overall or aircraft type flying experience of the two pilots involved or the Captain's time in command. When the clearance was actually given, it involved arriving via taxiway NC2, EP and EN.As the aircraft continued taxiing on NC2 and passed taxiway A7, clearance to line up and take off on Runway 20C was given.The TWR controller observed what was happening and instructed the aircraft to stop which it did before reaching taxiway A3. This instruction was found to have been given prior to the commencement of a rejected take-off. The maximum speed reached was not published. Our inhouse workshops just outside London are EASA Part 145, FAA Part 145 and TCCA Transport Canada approved. Both Rotable Repairs and Watts Aviation are part of the Desser Aerospace Group, Watts Aviation is a leading specialist in supplying aircraft tyres for Boeing 767 operators and many other fleet types. Our inhouse workshops just outside London are EASA Part 145, FAA Part 145 and TCCA Transport Canada approved. Both Rotable Repairs and Watts Aviation are part of the Desser Aerospace Group, Watts Aviation is a leading specialist in supplying aircraft tyres for Boeing 767 operators and many other fleet types. Repair, overhauls, and cost per aircraft landings CPAL are carried out to the highest standards in compliance with the Component Maintenance Manual and all spares unless otherwise specified are purchased from the OEM. Our investment in plant and machinery means that our productivity is maximised resulting in a high-quality product to an industry in which time is of critical importance. Rotable Repairs will continue to support customers with the same high level of service you have come to expect. Stay tuned for further updates via email, Linkedin or on Twitter.
Crew extended flaps and gear manualy but nose gear did not lock in position. Aircraft landed 30kts faster than normal 150kts landing speed. Front wheel collapsed on landing and nose dragged on runway helped aircraft to slow down. Ac came to rest 800ft from threshold and car race fans helped to put out fire that developed in the gear. One person got injured during evacuation. The first version, a 767-200, entered service in 1982 and its final delivery occurred in 1994. The 767 family has low fuel consumption and produces less pollutant per pound of fuel than other similar twin-engine aircraft. The Boeing 767-300F freighter is a derivative of 767-300ER airliner with all the materials, aerodynamics and propulsion improvements introduced in this model. It lacks windows and doors excepting a lateral entry door for crewmembers. The first Boeing 767-300F freighter was delivered by Boeing to United Parcel Service (UPS) in 1995. On 31 October 2005 Japanese carrier ANA confirmed an order for conversion of three Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft into Boeing Converted Freighters (BCFs). The agreement included options on four aircraft. ANA would take delivery of its converted aircraft between December 2007 through October 2008. The freighter conversion program is based on the Boeing 767-300ER aircraft. On 26 October 2006, ANA exercised a contract option for two additional Boeing 767-300 Boeing Converted Freighters. The first airplane will enter into the conversion program in April 2007 and will come out by December. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued this warning of potential erroneous autopilot flight director system (AFDS) guidance in a special airworthiness bulletin on April 16th. Popular jets such as the 787 face issues with their systems that could result in problems when landing on runways.